Spending monotonous hours among the common people, the resigned ones, the collaborators, the conformists - isn’t living; it’s a vegetative existence, simply the transport, in ambulatory form, of a mass of flesh and bones. Life needs the exquisite and sublime experience of rebellion in action as well as thought.
Severino Di Giovanni (via aflameoffreedom)

(via amodernmanifesto)

Man is alienated from his authentic self and…thus an easy, indeed willing, victim of a vast and efficient collective modeled after mass-production processes and often a brutalized weapon in the arsenal of such a collective in its effort to achieve universality.
William V. Spanos, A Casebook on Existentialism (via shanemcmuffin)

(Source: shaneloser, via fuckyeahexistentialism)

There is an inner beauty about a woman who believes in herself, who knows she is capable of anything that she puts her mind to. There is a beauty in the strength and determination of a woman who follows her own path, who isnt thrown off by obstacles along the way. There is a beauty about a woman whose confidence comes from experiences; who knows she can fall, pick herself up, and move on.
Unknown

(Source: onlinecounsellingcollege)

Do You Hear the People Sing?: A World to Win - the book: A rough guide to a future without global capitalism By Paul Feldman & Corinna Lotz

amodernmanifesto:

People throughout the world experience daily the impact of powerful economic and technological forces on their lives. The intensity and speed of change is unprecedented. Societies, communities and individuals are continuously buffeted by the globalisation whirlwind. Urban and rural areas have…

Democracy and “generally recognized” morality are not the only victims of imperialism. The third suffering martyr is “universal” common sense. This lowest form of the intellect is not only necessary under all conditions but under certain conditions is also adequate. Common sense’s basic capital consists of the elementary conclusions of universal experience: not to put one’s fingers in fire, whenever possible to proceed along a straight line, not to tease vicious dogs … and so forth and so on. Under a stable social milieu common sense is adequate for bargaining, healing, writing articles, leading trade unions, voting in parliament, marrying and reproducing the race. But when that same common sense attempts to go beyond its valid limits into the arena of more complex generalizations, it is exposed as just a clot of prejudices of a definite class and a definite epoch. No more than a simple capitalist crisis brings common sense to an impasse; and before such catastrophes as revolution, counter-revolution and war, common sense proves a perfect fool. In order to realize the catastrophic transgressions against the “normal” course of events higher qualities of intellect are necessary, philosophically expressed as yet only by dialectic materialism.
The paradox is that God is a fiction, but a fiction which structures our reality. It’s a symbolic fiction—it is efficient in its very inexistence. It doesn’t exist, but it nonetheless works. It is thus not enough to destroy the fiction from outside, to reduce it to reality, to demonstrate how it emerged from reality. This is what vulgar atheists like Dawkins are doing. The fiction has to be destroyed from within. To put it in descriptive terms, it is not enough to prove that God doesn’t exist; the formula of true atheism is that God himself must proclaim his inexsitence, must stop believing in himself. Therein resides the paradox. If we destroy the fiction from outside, just reducing it to reality, the fiction continues to function, to exert its symbolic efficiency—as in the famous joke about the atheist Zionists who do not believe that God exists but nonetheless believe that God gave them the land of Israel.
Slavoj Žižek, God Without the Sacred (via lewisandafrisbee)

(Source: valterbenyamin, via amodernmanifesto)

Why are so many problems today perceived as problems of intolerance, rather than as problems of inequality, exploitation, or injustice? Why is the proposed remedy tolerance, rather than emancipation, political struggle, or armed struggle?

Slavoj ŽižekLiving In The End Times, p. 5. (via humanformat)

Tolerance is bullshit. Tolerance is a power the dominant group has, where they so generously allow differences to exist, so long as thode differences don’t threaten the dominant cultural paradigm. That this authorization can be revoked just a easily as it’s given suggests that in any tolerant society, the hierarchy of race and the primacy of whiteness is still very much in play despite facile pretensions to the contrary.

(via ayiman)

Fuck this corporate “diversity culture” that works to mask and perpetuate inequality and exploitation of the oppressed. Corporate/capitalist “multiculturalism” has failed. THE OPPOSITE OF RACISM IS JUSTICE.

(via butterflyrevolt)

(Source: heraclitorus, via amodernmanifesto)

By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third, by experience, which is the bitterest.
Confucius (via kateoplis)
Open your ears, open your hearts. Don’t take yourselves too seriously and take yourself as seriously as death itself. Don’t worry. Worry your ass off. Have iron clad confidence. But doubt! It keeps you awake and alert. Believe you are the baddest ass in town and you suck. It keeps you honest. Be able to keep two completely contradictory ideas alive and well in your heart and head at all times. If it does not drive you crazy it will make you strong. Stay hard, stay hungry and stay alive.

Bruce Springsteen, SXSW keynote via guardian.co.uk

I don’t need no god when I’ve got my Boss.

(via byronic)

(via apoplecticskeptic)

I'm gonna put something clever here, someday.